Do In A Sentence

Q: How to use do in a sentence?

1. Why is not this to do evil? 2. Still we do not despair. 3. But we do not intend to abandon speculation. 4. But they do not get rid of difficulties by denying facts. 5. How, then, do they vindicate their own system?

Short & Simple Example Sentence For Do | Do Sentence

Why is not this to do evil?
Still we do not despair.
But we do not intend to abandon speculation.
But they do not get rid of difficulties by denying facts.
How, then, do they vindicate their own system?
Why then do we differ in our conclusions with respect to them?
How do they repel the frightful consequences which infidelity deduces from it?
Men do not act thus irrationally in physical investigations.
This is conceded on all sides, and has nothing to do with the question.
Why is it not to do evil, then, when it is done by the Almighty?
But is it true, that God must do all things within us, or he can do nothing?
In efficacious grace," says he, "God does all, and we do all.

How To Use Do In A Sentence?

The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work.
Why then do we refer these to the operation of a necessary cause, and not our volitions?
We do not love and choose the disobedience, but the thing which leads us to disobey.
What has such a thing to do with the origin of human volitions, or the nature of moral agency?
Yet we do trust, that we have attained to a clear and precise statement of old truths.
In truth, the feelings do not act at all, and consequently they cannot act upon the will.
Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
I contend," says he, "for liberty, as it signifies a power in man to do as he wills or pleases.
We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.
It reaches not to the interior sphere of the will itself, and has no more to do with its freedom than has the influence of the stars.
Hence it is said that this power over the will can do nothing, can cause no determination except by acting to produce it.
Why do we refer the judgment and the feeling to necessary causes, and fail to do the same in relation to the volition?
Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
The peculiar nature of that thing called volition, can do nothing, can have no influence, while it is not.
We deny not the reality of their Christian experience; but we do doubt the accuracy of their interpretation of it.
In using this language, we do not wish to be understood as laying claim to the discovery of any great truth, or any new principle.
Or, in other words, that it is right to do what would otherwise be morally evil, in order to accomplish a good end.
It is objected to him that God has formed them; and he can only reply, that the imperfection of matter does not permit him to do better.
We do not then intend to abandon speculation, but to plant it, if we can, on a better foundation, and build it up according to a better method.
The maxim teaches that "we may do evil," that it is lawful to do evil, with a view to the grand and glorious end to be attained by it.
Before I have time to do so, the power and the light which is thus shut out from the world by so pitiful a cause, is revealed in all its glory.
We may please to do a thing, nay, we may freely will it, and yet a natural necessity may cut off and prevent the external consequence of the act.
Because the field of our vision is so exceedingly limited, we do not see why it should be forever traversed by apparent inconsistencies and contradictions.
But, surely, we need have no weak fears on this ground; for although it may be too high for us, they do not pretend that it is too high for God.
As we do not wish to use opprobrious names, we shall characterize these three several schemes of doctrine by the appellations given to them by their advocates.
These are some of the hidden mysteries of the scheme of necessity; which having been detected and exposed, we do not hesitate to pronounce it a grand imposition on the reason of mankind.
The reason why the views of most persons concerning this relation are so vague and indistinct is, that they do not possess a sufficiently clear and perfect analysis of the human mind.
If he had carried on the various processes of his reasoning with some one clear and distinct idea before his mind, we might have expected great things from him; but he has not chosen to do so.