Man in a sentence 🔊

Definition of Man

Only used in man enough | (transitive) To supply (something) with staff or crew (of either sex). | (transitive) To take up position in order to operate (something).

Short Example Sentence for Man

  • 1. The first man succumbs to his power. 🔊
  • 2. No reasonable man should complain of such a precaution. 🔊
  • 3. Does this extend merely to man and not to Satan? 🔊
  • 4. The scheme of necessity denies that man is the responsible author of sin. 🔊
  • 5. How, then, is man a free-agent? and how is he accountable for his actions? 🔊
  • 6. That Man Is Responsible For The Existence Of Sin. 🔊

How to use Man in Sentence?

  • 1. The scheme of necessity denies that man is the responsible author of sin. 🔊
  • 2. How perfectly it shapes the freedom of man to fit the doctrine of predestination! 🔊
  • 3. I know a man is now walking before me; does this prove that he could not help walking? 🔊
  • 4. I contend," says he, "for liberty, as it signifies a power in man to do as he wills or pleases. 🔊
  • 5. If we ask, How can God be just in causing man to sin, and then punishing him for it? 🔊
  • 6. We have seen how ineffectual have been all their endeavours to show that their doctrine does not destroy the responsibility of man for his sins. 🔊
  • 7. There be who perpetually complain of schisms and sects, and make it such a calamity that any man dissents from their maxims. 🔊
  • 8. According to his view, the divine agency encircles all, and man is merely the subject of its influence. 🔊
  • 9. The man who confounds the sensibility with the will should, indeed, have no difficulty in reconciling the divine agency with the human. 🔊
  • 10. The hardship of such a conclusion would be still more apparent in regard to the conduct of a man whose general character is well known to be good. 🔊
  • 11. If a man is really laid under a necessity of sinning, it would certainly seem impossible to conceive that he is responsible for his sins. 🔊
  • 12. When he gave man a holy law, he really did not intend that he should obey and live, but that he should transgress and die. 🔊
  • 13. But surely, if any man imagined that even one world could create itself, it is scarcely worth while to reason with him. 🔊
  • 14. On the ground of reason, he believes in an absolute predestination of all things; and yet he concludes from experience that man is free. 🔊
  • 15. According to the one, though the divine favours are unequally distributed, no man is ever required to render an account of more than he receives. 🔊
  • 16. How then, may we ask, can a man be accountable for his volitions, over which he has no power, and in which he exerts no power? 🔊
  • 17. If, when a man willed one thing, another should happen to follow which he did not will, of course he would not be responsible for it. 🔊
  • 18. But Spinoza does not employ this idea of liberty, nor any other, to show that man is a responsible being. 🔊
  • 19. The mind of man is unduly affected by the present and the proximate; but to God there is neither remote nor future. 🔊
  • 20. The believer should not, for one moment, entertain the low view, that the atonement confers its benefits on man alone. 🔊
  • 21. In his attempt to reconcile the free-agency of man with the divine perfections, Descartes deceives himself by a false analogy. 🔊
  • 22. The atonement was made for man, it is true; but, in a still higher sense, man was made for the atonement. 🔊
  • 23. He expressly declares, that in order to constitute man an accountable agent, he must be free, not only from constraint, but also from necessity. 🔊
  • 24. We ask, How a man can be accountable for his acts, for his volitions, if they are caused in him by an infinite power? 🔊
  • 25. Thus, according to both Luther and Calvin, man was by the fall despoiled of the freedom of the will. 🔊
  • 26. Propound the same question to the roving savage, or to the man of mere common sense, and he will also answer, No. 🔊
  • 27. The universal reason of man declares that the will has not necessarily yielded like the intelligence and the sensibility, to motives over which it had no control. 🔊
  • 28. We agree with both Calvinistic and Arminian writers in the position, that no man is elected to eternal life on account of his merits. 🔊
  • 29. It is very true, that no man would be accountable for his external actions or their consequences, if there were no fixed relation between these and his volitions. 🔊
  • 30. On the principle of this objection, the insect should complain that it is not a man; the man that he is not an angel; and the angel that he is not a god. 🔊
  • 31. He merely dwells upon the terrors of the punishment, and brings these into vivid contrast with the weakness and impotency of man in his mortal state. 🔊
  • 32. How does he show, for example, that the first man was guilty and justly punishable for a transgression in which he succumbed to the divine omnipotence? 🔊
  • 33. If we should concede that they are a punishment, we should be compelled to admit that the sin of the first man is imputed to his posterity, and that he was their federal head. 🔊
  • 34. It is certainly irrational for a man to reject all the evidence of the spirituality of the soul, because he cannot reconcile this doctrine with the fact that a disease of the body disorders the mind. 🔊